Pages

Cultivating Accountability

A common issue that arises among personnel and leadership is the problem of accountability.  As I was reading through the NIV Leadership Bible I came across the following scripture and accompanying article.

Galatians 6:7 says, "A man reaps what he sows."  If we want to reap a workforce of service, performance, and excellence, then, as leaders we must demonstrate those qualities and also hold others accountable for meeting this expectation.  Theo Gilbert-Jamison gives the following five steps for holding employees accountable.

  1. Clearly define the expectation or standard - often times in the workplace when accusations are flying and goals are not being met, it is related to an incorrect or ill perceived expectation. Sometimes it becomes necessary to communicate the expectations of each individuals part on the team, so that everyone is on the same page when it comes to realistic expectations, and maintaining the standard. "People cannot be held accountable for what they have not been informed of."  
  2. Involve staff in efforts to raise the bar - after the expectation and standards have been set, allow all personnel to comment on, discuss, and voice their opinions or concerns on the new standard.  If everyone is talking about it, then you can be sure that it is understood and achieve buy-in.
  3. Integrate the new standard - Gilbert-Jamison says, "...expectations must be fully integrated into every aspect of the work environment to include the training and development process, performance review criteria, and all applicable systems and work processes."
  4. Set up measurements to quantify success - establish measurements and indicators to assess the effectiveness of the new standard, and ensure that it is being followed or implemented properly. This is a primary use for accountability, it allows this assessment to happen naturally.
  5. Recognize success and coach for improvement - accountability reveals our strengths and weaknesses. When we identify these, we can then focus our coaching and development efforts where they are most needed.

Happy Thanksgiving 2013!

We are thankful for you, our readers, and TheCodeCoach.com community, for their efforts in making the world a better and safer place through excellence in fire protection and life safety. 

Something to keep in mind:




Happy Thanksgiving from TheCodeCoach.com!


A Tale of Two Labels



OSHA recognizeds two types of labeling in its Hazard Communications Standard, GHS and NFPA 704.  GHS is the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals, and NFPA 704 refers to the National Fire Protection Association document 704, Identification of the Hazard of Materials for Emergency Response.

NFPA 704 provides an easily recognizable combination of color coding and numbers so that first responders can quickly identify the hazards associated with a certain product.  The Hazard Communications Standard (HC2012) is an information system intended for those who work with chemicals on a routine basis.

Of the more confusing differences is the fact that NFPA 704 utilizes a numerical system for rating hazards, and the GHS system does, as well. However, NFPA 704 numbering is from 0-4 with 4 indicating the highest hazard.  GHS numbering is from 1-4 with 4 indicating the lowest hazard.

NFPA has created a .pdf document that outlines these differences (image below). This document was created so that it could be printed, laminated, and utilized as a quick reference guide. Get the full  document here, NFPA704/HC2012 Quick Card.